{"id":61,"date":"2005-04-14T02:35:42","date_gmt":"2005-04-14T02:35:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubuntucat.wordpress.com\/2005\/04\/14\/what-good-is-science-in-the-media\/"},"modified":"2005-04-14T02:35:42","modified_gmt":"2005-04-14T02:35:42","slug":"what-good-is-science-in-the-media","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.psychocats.net\/ubuntucat\/what-good-is-science-in-the-media\/","title":{"rendered":"What Good is Science in the Media?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>At the time of this writing, there is <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/uk_news\/4436021.stm\" target=\"_top\">a &#8220;hot&#8221; news story<\/a> about how the myth of women&#8217;s intuition is wrong and that men may actually be more intuitive. The media loves to jump on &#8220;studies&#8221; like these because they&#8217;re controversial and have unexpected results (at least as far as what the media calls &#8220;results&#8221;&mdash;these results may not be the actual conclusions the studies&#8217; scientists came to). <\/p>\n<p> There are a few problems with coming to the conclusion that men are more intuitive than women based on this new study. First of all, the differences in results of correct responses 1% for spotting real smiles and 9% for spotting fake smiles. The news stories don&#8217;t specify how many people were involved in the study, but it&#8217;s fair to say that even most comprehensive studies usually have at least a 2% margin of error, if not more. So, basically, men and women have the same intuition&#8230; which leads to the next problem with this study: who says that being able to spot a fake or real smile off of pictures of people you don&#8217;t know measures &#8220;intuition&#8221;? <\/p>\n<p> Now, when we were in college, I remember there was a time when I mentioned something about having used my intuition, and my (now) wife smarmily replied, &#8220;Men don&#8217;t have intuitions.&#8221; I don&#8217;t believe this to be true, of course, but I also don&#8217;t think these new scientific studies&mdash;claiming men not only have intuitions but are actually <i>more<\/i> intuitive than women&mdash;are of any value. <\/p>\n<p> Intuition, as I&#8217;ve seen it commonly used, anticipates an outcome or reassesses a situation in light of its possible outcome. In my readings about acquaintance and date rape, <i>intuition<\/i> is often mentioned as a good indicator that one should get out of uncomfortable situations that could eventually become rape. I don&#8217;t know if women are actually more intuitive or not, as a group, but I would see intuition as being able to sense when in a group that some in the group may feel awkward or need comfort. Intuition may be that gut feeling that you should check for a lost item in a place no one else would have thought to look. I never see someone look at a picture, say &#8220;That&#8217;s a fake smile,&#8221; and hear others oo and ah over her intuition. (&#8220;Wow! You really spotted the fake smile in that photo. You&#8217;re very intuitive.) <\/p>\n<p> Intuition isn&#8217;t the larger issue, though; the larger issue is how the media skews sometimes real and balanced scientific studies to be conclusive and shocking, simplistic news. &#8220;Water may be more dangerous than dehydration!&#8221; &#8220;New study shows classical music makes you smarter!&#8221; <\/p>\n<p> I don&#8217;t know how many people read these &#8220;scientific&#8221; news stories and get taken in by them, but I wouldn&#8217;t trust the news to report accurately about science any more than I would trust it to report accurately on education.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At the time of this writing, there is a &#8220;hot&#8221; news story about how the myth of women&#8217;s intuition is wrong and that men may actually be more intuitive. The media loves to jump on &#8220;studies&#8221; like these because they&#8217;re controversial and have unexpected results (at least as far as what the media calls &#8220;results&#8221;&mdash;these&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.psychocats.net\/ubuntucat\/what-good-is-science-in-the-media\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">What Good is Science in the Media?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-61","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-race-class-gender-sexuality","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.psychocats.net\/ubuntucat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.psychocats.net\/ubuntucat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.psychocats.net\/ubuntucat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.psychocats.net\/ubuntucat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.psychocats.net\/ubuntucat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.psychocats.net\/ubuntucat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.psychocats.net\/ubuntucat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.psychocats.net\/ubuntucat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.psychocats.net\/ubuntucat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}