<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who has a right to talk?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/who-has-a-right-to-talk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/who-has-a-right-to-talk/</link>
	<description>Random musings from the radical feminist Christian antiracist left - some having to do with Ubuntu</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:52:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aspiringgeek</title>
		<link>http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/who-has-a-right-to-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-1346</link>
		<dc:creator>aspiringgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntucat.wordpress.com/?p=283#comment-1346</guid>
		<description>I guess we are all ultimately visual creatures - we can&#039;t entirely let go of what our perceived notions. A man can never be taken seriously 100% in feminist discourse because all we can see is that you are a man. Likewise for racial discourses. It doesn&#039;t matter if what you say makes more sense than others &#039;native&#039; to that particular discourse because if you visually don&#039;t belong, that line of attack to discredit your argument is always there.

And thanks for your book recommendations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess we are all ultimately visual creatures &#8211; we can&#8217;t entirely let go of what our perceived notions. A man can never be taken seriously 100% in feminist discourse because all we can see is that you are a man. Likewise for racial discourses. It doesn&#8217;t matter if what you say makes more sense than others &#8216;native&#8217; to that particular discourse because if you visually don&#8217;t belong, that line of attack to discredit your argument is always there.</p>
<p>And thanks for your book recommendations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

