<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu 9.04 (Jaunty Jackalope) Beta First Impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/ubuntu-904-jaunty-jackalope-beta-first-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/ubuntu-904-jaunty-jackalope-beta-first-impressions/</link>
	<description>Random musings from the radical feminist Christian antiracist left - some having to do with Ubuntu</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:53:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jap1968</title>
		<link>http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/ubuntu-904-jaunty-jackalope-beta-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-5415</link>
		<dc:creator>jap1968</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 09:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/?p=1154#comment-5415</guid>
		<description>I am also using Ubuntu 9.04 on this saem netbook and I am really happy with this release. For me, the notification system is ok, not being intrusive.

I have also an entry on my blog, including some screenshots and a video illustrating boot time. Yo can have a look here:

http://netpatia.blogspot.com/2009/05/ubuntu-904-on-asus-eee-pc-701.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also using Ubuntu 9.04 on this saem netbook and I am really happy with this release. For me, the notification system is ok, not being intrusive.</p>
<p>I have also an entry on my blog, including some screenshots and a video illustrating boot time. Yo can have a look here:</p>
<p><a href="http://netpatia.blogspot.com/2009/05/ubuntu-904-on-asus-eee-pc-701.html" rel="nofollow">http://netpatia.blogspot.com/2009/05/ubuntu-904-on-asus-eee-pc-701.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fevrin</title>
		<link>http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/ubuntu-904-jaunty-jackalope-beta-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-4989</link>
		<dc:creator>Fevrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 14:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/?p=1154#comment-4989</guid>
		<description>Hearing everyone say that Jaunty is the &quot;Best Ubuntu Evar&quot; really got me excited about it.  I tried the LiveCD before committing, of course, but while in that environment, a critical issue holds me back: wireless.  My HWP54G (rt2500-pci) wireless card works fine in Hardy , but starting with Intrepid, it just hasn&#039;t been working; it sees my wireless network just fine, but after filling out the security info, it never connects.  Instead, it has the gall to ask for the password again and again!

I&#039;m sure this is never an issue for those wired folks, but this is a serious regression, and it worries me that future Ubuntu releases won&#039;t have this fixed.  Until I can get wireless, I just can&#039;t agree that this is a good release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hearing everyone say that Jaunty is the &#8220;Best Ubuntu Evar&#8221; really got me excited about it.  I tried the LiveCD before committing, of course, but while in that environment, a critical issue holds me back: wireless.  My HWP54G (rt2500-pci) wireless card works fine in Hardy , but starting with Intrepid, it just hasn&#8217;t been working; it sees my wireless network just fine, but after filling out the security info, it never connects.  Instead, it has the gall to ask for the password again and again!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure this is never an issue for those wired folks, but this is a serious regression, and it worries me that future Ubuntu releases won&#8217;t have this fixed.  Until I can get wireless, I just can&#8217;t agree that this is a good release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ubuntucat</title>
		<link>http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/ubuntu-904-jaunty-jackalope-beta-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-4818</link>
		<dc:creator>ubuntucat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/?p=1154#comment-4818</guid>
		<description>I would definitely upgrade. 9.04 runs faster for me on my Eee PC than 8.04 or 8.10 did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely upgrade. 9.04 runs faster for me on my Eee PC than 8.04 or 8.10 did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/ubuntu-904-jaunty-jackalope-beta-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-4808</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 04:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/?p=1154#comment-4808</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to hear that 9.04 will run on such a low setup as a 900mhz computer. I have a 1ghz p3 with 512mb of ram I&#039;m just dying to update from 8.04 to 9.04.

The only killer may be my intel graphics.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to hear that 9.04 will run on such a low setup as a 900mhz computer. I have a 1ghz p3 with 512mb of ram I&#8217;m just dying to update from 8.04 to 9.04.</p>
<p>The only killer may be my intel graphics&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tuxdesktop</title>
		<link>http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/ubuntu-904-jaunty-jackalope-beta-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-4641</link>
		<dc:creator>tuxdesktop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/?p=1154#comment-4641</guid>
		<description>I went with EXT4 and it really seems to be stable and quick. I am very impressed with it right now. Ofcourse I have updated through RC so far for both my Ubuntu box and Kubuntu box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went with EXT4 and it really seems to be stable and quick. I am very impressed with it right now. Ofcourse I have updated through RC so far for both my Ubuntu box and Kubuntu box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josvazg</title>
		<link>http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/ubuntu-904-jaunty-jackalope-beta-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-4467</link>
		<dc:creator>josvazg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/?p=1154#comment-4467</guid>
		<description>Compiz works, but...
- GoogleEarth used to work in Xandros (or Windows XP), but it is UNUSUBLE in intrepid.
- glxgears fps droped from 1500fps in Ubuntu 7.04 to 600fps in intrepid.
- Planet Penguin racer (the 3d game) does only 3-4fps, not nice to play.
Should I continue?...
Phoronix has some article regarding this performance regression, that is lasting TOO long (over a year already)
3D is very important as most modern graphics, even 2D ones, rely on 3D hw functions of the graphics processors. (Ie. zoom effects in small iphones and their competitors, etc)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compiz works, but&#8230;<br />
- GoogleEarth used to work in Xandros (or Windows XP), but it is UNUSUBLE in intrepid.<br />
- glxgears fps droped from 1500fps in Ubuntu 7.04 to 600fps in intrepid.<br />
- Planet Penguin racer (the 3d game) does only 3-4fps, not nice to play.<br />
Should I continue?&#8230;<br />
Phoronix has some article regarding this performance regression, that is lasting TOO long (over a year already)<br />
3D is very important as most modern graphics, even 2D ones, rely on 3D hw functions of the graphics processors. (Ie. zoom effects in small iphones and their competitors, etc)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ubuntucat</title>
		<link>http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/ubuntu-904-jaunty-jackalope-beta-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-4459</link>
		<dc:creator>ubuntucat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/?p=1154#comment-4459</guid>
		<description>What issues do you mean? Unfortunately, I may not be the best person to ask, since I don&#039;t use desktop effects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What issues do you mean? Unfortunately, I may not be the best person to ask, since I don&#8217;t use desktop effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josvazg</title>
		<link>http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/ubuntu-904-jaunty-jackalope-beta-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-4458</link>
		<dc:creator>josvazg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/?p=1154#comment-4458</guid>
		<description>I am also interested about info/updates on the issues with Intel graphics regressions in Jaunty?

(I think 3D performance is very important for Linux future as of nearly 2010)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also interested about info/updates on the issues with Intel graphics regressions in Jaunty?</p>
<p>(I think 3D performance is very important for Linux future as of nearly 2010)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Hunt</title>
		<link>http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/ubuntu-904-jaunty-jackalope-beta-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-3944</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/?p=1154#comment-3944</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that info - perhaps the other improvements incorporated have made up for the use of RAM by &quot;notify-osd&quot;?

I have an AMD Antalon 1.8 Ghz processor and 512 MB of RAM, so it sounds like it should work okay. I&#039;m waiting until the official release to install it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that info &#8211; perhaps the other improvements incorporated have made up for the use of RAM by &#8220;notify-osd&#8221;?</p>
<p>I have an AMD Antalon 1.8 Ghz processor and 512 MB of RAM, so it sounds like it should work okay. I&#8217;m waiting until the official release to install it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ubuntucat</title>
		<link>http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/ubuntu-904-jaunty-jackalope-beta-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-3939</link>
		<dc:creator>ubuntucat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/?p=1154#comment-3939</guid>
		<description>I have an underclocked 900 MHz processor and 1 GB of RAM on my Eee PC, and Jaunty is speedier than any other Ubuntu release I&#039;ve used on this thing (7.10, 8.04, and 8.10)&#8212;and that&#039;s with the new notifications running. So I can&#039;t say it really makes anything slower.

I haven&#039;t run any official benchmarks, but nothing appears at all to be slower. Everything seems faster, as a matter of fact (boot time, application load time, general responsiveness of windows and mouse clicks).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an underclocked 900 MHz processor and 1 GB of RAM on my Eee PC, and Jaunty is speedier than any other Ubuntu release I&#8217;ve used on this thing (7.10, 8.04, and 8.10)&mdash;and that&#8217;s with the new notifications running. So I can&#8217;t say it really makes anything slower.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t run any official benchmarks, but nothing appears at all to be slower. Everything seems faster, as a matter of fact (boot time, application load time, general responsiveness of windows and mouse clicks).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

